|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Los Angeles Herald, August 7, 1908OFFICIALS VISIT THE RED-LIGHT DISTRICT |
|
|
The police commissioners, with the mayor, City Attorney Hewitt and the chief of police, held an executive session yesterday afternoon, during which the social evil was the subject of discussion. [This kind of closed meeting would be illegal today under the Brown Act.] After they had deliberated until they had reached a deadlock, they all piled into one of the citys automobiles and went down to the questionable district. If any |
conclusion was reached, it was not announced last night.
The plan the mayor favors . . . is to appoint a committee of 100 reputable men and have them make a thorough investigation. . . . The [Police] Commission would act of the advice of the committee, and the action would be permanent, so far as the present administration is concerned. |
|
Even at the distance of almost one hundred years, this story is amusing! |
|
Los Angeles Herald, August 2, 1908
|
||
|
The ordinance providing for catching dogs is obsolete, and something will have to be done, and done quickly. The city cannot afford to have these broils between dog catchers and private citizens or our streets every day or two. That was the opinion Mayor Harper gave yesterday morning when asked for his opinion on the agitation for a new system of dog catching. . . . the general public always hates a dog catcher any time and any place. This thing of fights every day or two between the deputy dog catchers and private citizens drives home forcibly the fact that the present system is wrong. . . . Mrs. L.E. Giese, who appears to be active in this movement, has been to me |
a number of times, and we have grown to understand each other thoroughly.
Mrs. Giese, I believe, will tell you my hearts in the right place but I am more or less misguided. . . . Three dog catchers appeared in Police Justice Chambers court yesterday morning to answer to charges of disturbing the peace and battery [beating up another person]. Ernest Britt, E.J. Christopher and Mike Catalina were accused of having committed battery upon A.J. Harris, A. Coplan and Sam Hallner, because the latter men remonstrated with the canine chasers when they were using abusive and profane language to a young woman at First and Santa Fe Avenue Friday |
afternoon. . .
Coplan, the aged expressman, who was badly beaten by the dog catchers, was in court when Britt and his assistants were being arraigned. The brave old man, whose efforts to prevent a young woman from being insulted resulted in his being brutally beaten, had his head swathed in bandages. . . . The unkempt appearance and insolent attitude of the three dog catchers did not create a favorable impression . . ., and more than one outside the court expressed the opinion that if such men had the power to capture dumb brutes it was reason enough for the abolition of the dog-catching system. . . . |
| | E-mail the site owner | |
| What if you lived a hundred years ago? Click here to find out what it could be like for you. | ||
| For a personal look at Los Angeles in the 1920s and 1930s, click for a new book by George Garrigues He Usually Lived With a Female: The Life of a California Newspaperman |
||